MONNOS (MNS) Token Analysis Tool
Token Overview
Total Supply: 2.94 Billion MNS
Blockchain: Ethereum (ERC-20)
Launch Date: November 18, 2019
Current Price: $0.00000135
Market Cap: $108.9K
24h Volume: $5-$10
All-Time High: $0.00978
Price Change: -99.9%
Market Performance
With a current price of $0.00000135, the token is trading far below its all-time high of $0.00978.
Market capitalization is currently around $108.9K, and daily trading volume remains extremely low at just $5-$10.
Key Risks
- Extremely low liquidity leading to potential price manipulation
- Unclear circulating supply reported by some trackers
- Limited competition from established copy-trading platforms
- Minimal development activity since 2021
- Potential regulatory risks due to copy-trading nature
Investment Evaluation
This tool helps evaluate whether MONNOS (MNS) aligns with your investment criteria:
Recommendation:
Based on your inputs, this token is considered a high-risk speculative asset.
Quick Facts
- Pre-mined: Yes
- Trading Pairs: MNS/USDT (ProBit), MNS/USDT (MEXC)
- Wallet Compatibility: Any ERC-20 compatible wallet
- Gas Fees: Apply to transfers
- Copy Trading: Enabled via smart contracts
TL;DR
- MONNOS (MNS) is an Ethereum‑based ERC‑20 token launched in November2019.
- It powers a copy‑trading platform that mirrors the strategies of successful crypto traders.
- Total supply is about 2.94billion tokens; no mining, all tokens were pre‑minted.
- Current market cap is under $110K and daily trading volume is typically below $1,000.
- Price has fallen >99% from its 2021 peak, and liquidity is very thin.
What Is MONNOS (MNS)?
When people ask “what is MONNOS (MNS)?” they are really looking for a quick snapshot of a niche crypto that tries to simplify trading. MONNOS (MNS) is an ERC‑20 token built on the Ethereum blockchain. Launched on 18November2019, the token backs a copy‑trading service that lets users automatically follow the trade‑execution of selected pro traders.
Token Basics
The token’s technical specs are straightforward:
- Total supply: 2,942,056,787 MNS (≈2.9billion).
- Maximum supply: capped at the same figure - no new minting after launch.
- Standard: ERC‑20, so it works with any wallet that supports Ethereum tokens.
- Mining: not applicable - all tokens were pre‑minted during the Initial Exchange Offering (IEO).
Because it lives on Ethereum, every transfer incurs the network’s gas fees, and the token inherits Ethereum’s security model.
How the Copy‑Trading Platform Works
MONNOS’s core promise is “passive crypto investing without the knowledge gap.” The platform does three things:
- Ranks traders based on historical performance, risk metrics, and draw‑down.
- Allows users to allocate a portion of their MNS holdings to a chosen trader’s strategy.
- Automatically mirrors each trade - buy, sell, or hold - in the user’s wallet in real‑time.
From a user’s perspective, you deposit MNS into a smart contract, select a trader, and the contract executes the same orders the trader places on the broader market. No manual order entry is required.
Market Performance Overview
Market data paints a bleak picture for the token:
- All‑time high: $0.00978 on 22March2021.
- Current price: roughly $0.00000135 on MEXC, $0.0514 on CoinGecko (price discrepancy reflects low liquidity).
- Market cap: about $108.9K.
- 24‑hour volume: $5-$10 across major trackers, with occasional spikes up to $533 on CoinLore.
- Price is down >99% from its peak and down >87% over the past year.
Compared with Bitcoin and Ethereum, MNS underperforms dramatically - annual returns are in the double‑digit negative range, and the token’s volatility is amplified by its tiny trading base.
Where You Can Trade MNS
The token is listed only on a handful of centralized exchanges. The most active pair is MNS/USDT on ProBit Global. MEXC also offers a direct MNS market, but order books are thin and price slippage can exceed 30% for modest trade sizes.
Because MNS lives on Ethereum, you can hold it in any ERC‑20 compatible wallet (MetaMask, Trust Wallet, hardware wallets, etc.). However, moving the token between exchanges incurs Ethereum gas, which can be a sizable fraction of the token’s value when gas spikes.
Risks, Criticisms, and Liquidity Problems
Several red flags emerge when you dig deeper:
- Liquidity: Daily volume rarely breaks $1,000, meaning large buys or sells will move the price dramatically.
- Transparency: Circulating supply is listed as “0?” on some trackers, indicating poor reporting from the project team.
- Competition: Established copy‑trading services (eToro, ZuluTrade) and newer DeFi protocols offer richer ecosystems, better UX, and deeper liquidity.
- Development activity: Public updates have been scarce since 2021, raising concerns about ongoing support.
- Regulatory exposure: Copy‑trading can blur lines between advisory services and investment products, potentially attracting regulator scrutiny in major jurisdictions.
For an investor looking for a low‑cost entry into crypto copy‑trading, MNS may look attractive, but the combination of thin markets and uncertain roadmap makes it a high‑risk speculative play.
Future Outlook - Is There Anything to Hope For?
There are three possible scenarios for MONNOS:
- Revival through partnership: If the team secures a tie‑up with a larger DeFi platform, the token could gain exposure and liquidity.
- Gradual sunset: Without fresh development funds, the contract may remain functional but see negligible user activity, effectively turning MNS into a collectible token.
- Community‑driven fork: Some enthusiasts could fork the smart contracts, rebrand, and attempt to reboot the service on a lower‑fee chain like Binance Smart Chain.
At present, no concrete announcements point to a revival, so investors should treat MNS as a speculative asset with an uncertain horizon.
How to Evaluate a Low‑Liquidity Token Like MNS
When you encounter a token with the profile of MONNOS, run through this quick checklist:
- Team & roadmap: Look for regular development updates, GitHub commits, or AMA sessions.
- Exchange depth: Check order‑book depth on multiple exchanges; thin books signal price manipulation risk.
- Use‑case relevance: Is the underlying service (copy‑trading) still in demand compared to newer alternatives?
- Tokenomics clarity: Confirm total vs. circulating supply and any vesting schedules.
- Community health: Active Discord, Telegram, or Reddit threads indicate user interest.
If most boxes are empty, consider staying out or limiting exposure to a tiny fraction of your portfolio.
Quick Reference Table
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Launch date | 18Nov2019 |
| Standard | ERC‑20 (Ethereum) |
| Total supply | 2.94B MNS |
| Current price (USD) | ≈$0.00000135 (MEXC) / $0.0514 (CoinGecko) |
| Market cap | ~$108.9K |
| 24‑h volume | $5-$10 (average) |
| Primary exchange | ProBit Global (MNS/USDT) |
| Core use‑case | Copy‑trading platform |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does MONNOS stand for?
The project does not publicly disclose an acronym expansion; the name is simply the brand identifier for the MNS token and its copy‑trading service.
Can I mine MONNOS tokens?
No. MONNOS is an ERC‑20 token that was fully minted before launch, so there is no mining or staking reward mechanism.
Is the MONNOS platform decentralized?
The token itself runs on the decentralized Ethereum blockchain, but the copy‑trading service is hosted on centralized servers and accessed via centralized exchanges.
How do I withdraw my MNS after copying a trader?
Withdrawals are handled through the smart contract UI: you disconnect from the chosen trader, then send the remaining MNS to any ERC‑20 compatible wallet. Gas fees apply.
Is MONNOS a good long‑term investment?
Given the token’s thin liquidity, steep price decline, and limited development updates, it is considered high‑risk. Most analysts advise only a minimal allocation if you want exposure to the copy‑trading niche.
Fiona Chow
September 28, 2025 AT 18:04Wow, another coin that’s basically a glorified copy‑paste job.
Shanthan Jogavajjala
September 28, 2025 AT 18:29The tokenomics present a classic case of pre‑minted supply with negligible burn mechanisms, leading to a static circulating metric that undermines any meaningful price discovery. From a liquidity depth standpoint, the order‑book on ProBit shows sub‑$1k daily volume, which translates to a slippage factor that dwarfs typical market‑making thresholds. Moreover, the smart‑contract interface lacks modular upgradeability, suggesting a static codebase that hasn't been audited since 2021. In essence, the protocol's gas overhead, combined with an exponential decay in active user addresses, creates a negative feedback loop for price appreciation. Without a clear on‑chain governance proposal to reallocate vesting or introduce staking incentives, the asset remains a textbook example of a dormant ERC‑20.
Millsaps Delaine
September 28, 2025 AT 19:02The discourse surrounding MONNOS (MNS) unfurls like a tapestry woven from the threads of speculative fervor, institutional neglect, and an almost theatrical commitment to obsolescence. One must first acknowledge the token's genesis, a pre‑mined issuance that eschewed community‑driven distribution in favor of a centralized seed that now haunts its market cap with a spectral permanence. The copy‑trading mechanism, ostensibly the project's raison d'être, suffers from a paucity of algorithmic sophistication that would otherwise enable adaptive risk calibration. Consequently, the platform's user acquisition funnel remains clogged with the detritus of unfulfilled promises, a phenomenon observable in the stagnant Discord activity metrics over the past eighteen months. From a macro‑economic perspective, the asset's price trajectory mirrors a decaying exponential, having relinquished over ninety‑nine percent of its all‑time high, a descent that betrays both liquidity insufficiency and an erosion of trust among retail participants. The token's on‑chain analytics reveal an anomalously low number of active addresses relative to total supply, a disparity that further accentuates the risk of price manipulation by a handful of whales. Moreover, the absence of any discernible staking or yield‑generation layer strips the token of utility beyond its mere speculative veneer. The broader ecosystem, populated by more robust copy‑trading platforms such as eToro and ZuluTrade, renders MNS a peripheral contender at best, relegated to the periphery of the decentralized finance narrative. Regulatory scrutiny, while not yet manifested in formal enforcement actions, looms as an ever‑present specter given the platform's ambiguous classification between a financial advisory service and a pure protocol. Should a jurisdiction elect to deem the service as an unregistered investment contract, the repercussions could cascade through the token's already fragile market structure. In summation, MONNOS stands as a cautionary exemplar of an ERC‑20 project that, without decisive governance intervention, strategic partnership, or a reinvigorated development roadmap, is destined to linger in the annals of crypto's many forgotten experiments.
meredith farmer
September 28, 2025 AT 19:44It’s almost as if the whole MONNOS saga was engineered by shadowy entities seeking to trap unsuspecting investors. The token’s sudden price dump coincides suspiciously with a series of obscure wallet movements that could only be orchestrated by an insider cabal. Every time the community raises a legitimate concern, the official channels go silent, feeding the narrative that there’s a larger, hidden agenda at play. The platform’s reliance on centralized servers for copy‑trading further amplifies the risk of manipulation, as a single point of failure can be exploited without any on‑chain transparency. In an era where decentralization is championed, MONNOS appears to be the antithesis, a meticulously crafted illusion to siphon funds under the guise of innovation.
Peter Johansson
September 28, 2025 AT 20:34Hey folks, I get the skepticism, but remember every crypto had a rough start – think Bitcoin in 2010! If you’re looking to dabble, allocate just a tiny slice of your portfolio, keep an eye on gas fees, and treat it as a learning experiment. 😊 Stay safe and happy trading!
Cindy Hernandez
September 28, 2025 AT 21:32For anyone considering a dip into MNS, make sure to check the contract address on Etherscan before transferring. Using a hardware wallet can mitigate the risk of phishing attacks, and setting a low gas limit can prevent overpaying during network congestion. Also, keep an eye on the order books; a sudden spike in slippage often signals a liquidity crunch.
mark gray
September 28, 2025 AT 22:39While the token’s history isn’t pretty, it’s worth noting that the community has remained surprisingly calm despite the volatility. If you’re cautious, you could treat MNS as a speculative side‑bet rather than a core holding, ensuring that any loss won’t impact your financial stability.
Samuel Wilson
September 28, 2025 AT 23:54From a technical standpoint, the liquidity depth on both ProBit and MEXC is insufficient to support substantial trades without inducing severe price impact. The order‑book saturation at the $0.000001 range demonstrates a thin market, which is a red flag for potential manipulation. It is advisable to monitor the spread and avoid large orders unless you are prepared for possible slippage beyond 30 percent.
Donald Barrett
September 29, 2025 AT 01:17What a joke. This token is a textbook scam – pre‑minted, no real use case, and a market cap that looks like a joke on paper. If you think anyone’s buying this, you’re either gullible or starving for a quick loss.
Christina Norberto
September 29, 2025 AT 02:49In contemplating the broader implications of MONNOS, one must grapple with the epistemological void that underpins its very existence. The token purports to democratize copy‑trading yet furnishes an apparatus devoid of transparent governance, thereby engendering a paradox wherein empowerment is supplanted by obfuscation. Such a dichotomy evokes the classic dialectic of appearance versus reality, compelling the prudent observer to interrogate the ontological foundations of its purported utility. Consequently, the token’s trajectory may be interpreted not merely as a market phenomenon but as a manifestation of the latent anxieties that pervade contemporary financial engineering.
Angela Yeager
September 29, 2025 AT 04:29Appreciate the optimism! If anyone’s testing the waters, just start tiny and keep your expectations realistic. The community can be a good place to learn the ropes together.
vipin kumar
September 29, 2025 AT 06:17There’s a hidden agenda here – the token’s developers are likely funneling funds into offshore accounts while feeding us false promises. The sudden drop in volume aligns with a coordinated effort to off‑load holdings before the market realizes the truth.
Lara Cocchetti
September 29, 2025 AT 08:14While I understand the desire to stay calm, it’s morally incumbent upon each of us to call out the misleading narratives that are being peddled. Pretending everything is fine only perpetuates the victimisation of naïve investors.
Mark Briggs
September 29, 2025 AT 10:19Nice try. Thanks.
Adetoyese Oluyomi-Deji Olugunna
September 29, 2025 AT 12:32The recent discourse surrounding MONNOS (MNS) seems to be plagued by a confluence of misinterpretations, missteps, and misguided optimism. One cannot ignore the fact that the token's architecture is predicated upon an antiquated copy‑trading paradigm, which, in itself, is a relic in the rapidly evolving DeFi landscape. Moreover, the scarcity of developer commiits on the project’s Github repository since late 2021 underscores a stagnation in innovation that is, frankly, disheartening. The price decay of over ninety‑nine percent from its all‑time high is not merely a statistical footnote; it serves as a stark indicator of market attrition and eroding confidence among fiduciary participants. Liquidity, as evidenced by peripheral exchanges, remains distressingly thin, raising the specter of market manipulation via wash‑trading and order book spoofing. In conside‑ration of regulatory scrutiny-particularly in jurisdictions that have begun to delineate the legal boundaries of copy‑trading services-the token’s compliance posture appears nebulous at best. Consequently, investors seeking a semblance of stability would do well to re‑evaluate their exposure, perhaps diversifying into assets with demonstrable utility, robust governance frameworks, and transparent development pipelines. Ultimately, the narrative of MONNOS is a cautionary tale of what transpires when speculative hype eclipses substantive value creation.
Krithika Natarajan
September 29, 2025 AT 14:54I feel for anyone caught in this swirl. If you decide to stay, please keep your expectations realistic and protect yourself with proper risk management.
Ayaz Mudarris
September 29, 2025 AT 17:24Remember, every setback is an opportunity to learn. Approach MNS with a disciplined plan, set stop‑losses, and view any loss as part of the educational journey. Stay resilient!
Vaishnavi Singh
September 29, 2025 AT 20:02Interesting angle, but I remain skeptical about any hidden motives.
Rae Harris
September 29, 2025 AT 22:49Sure, everyone’s talking about the low liquidity, but what if the next wave of DeFi integration gives it a sudden burst? I’d vote to keep a sliver just in case the hype returns.
victor white
September 30, 2025 AT 01:44One must consider the epistemic hierarchy of tokenomics; MONNOS, in its current incarnation, exemplifies an overextension of copy‑trading ambition without the requisite infrastructural scaffolding.
mark gray
September 30, 2025 AT 04:47Bottom line: treat MNS as a micro‑speculation-allocate what you can afford to lose, monitor the order books, and don’t expect any miracles.
Fiona Chow
September 30, 2025 AT 07:51At the end of the day, the market will decide. If the community can rally around a real upgrade or partnership, maybe we’ll see a modest rebound, but until then, caution is the only sensible path.